검색창 열기 인더뉴스 부·울·경

Issue Plus 이슈+

[iSSF 2020] Popular Culture in the Post-Coronavirus Era – Structural Changes in Meetings, Communication, and Empathy ③

URL복사

Wednesday, September 02, 2020, 16:09:00

Ildong JOE, Assistant professor, The Academy of Korean Studies.
“Communitas, will take place in various structures after COVID-19"

 

[iN THE NEWS Eunsil YOO]We listen to music with our earphones and watch movies through the screen of our mobile phones. It looks like a very personal, independent activity. People might think that they are just listening to streaming music alone.

 

However, that simple activity involves the process of empathizing with all the people who were part of the process of creating that song, directing, recording, compiling, setting it to the appropriate volume, and distributing the song via the sound of music.

 

I occasionally meet people who hate going to concerts where lots of people scream and gather and prefer to listen to music alone at home with nice speakers. They say they consider music to be “appreciating.” These types of people sometimes insist that listening to music is an extremely personal experience, rather than an activity that fosters relationships with other people.

 

However, these people who listen to music and watch movies alone also look for more movies made by their favorite director, more music by their favorite artists, and gather more information.

 

Looking for information is a way of “meeting” information that was recorded, organized, and shared by somebody. In other words, even though you’re not physically ‘together,’ all activities of enjoying popular culture can be seen as social activities.

 

Christopher Small coined the word “musicking” while actively exploring musical activities. He argued that everyone including the musician, composer, audience, and even people who are seemingly irrelevant to music, such as the people who move the instruments and ticketing staff members, are “all contributing to the nature of the event that is a musical performance.”

 

Small said this in reference to classical music concerts, and media scholar John Fiske said that popular culture texts are incomplete by themselves. Popular culture becomes complete when it is accepted by an individual and becomes a part of that person’s life, and when significance is formed between that person and someone else who recognizes that cultural sign.

 

At the very moment when you experience sharing communication with someone who likes the same music, movies, novels, and cartoons, popular culture is completed as a real popular culture. From this perspective, it is not a strange obsession to search for others’ comments and clicking on “Like” icons on YouTube, Twitch, or FaceBook even though listening to a song (that you came across coincidentally) of an artist only you like is satisfactory enough. It is a natural process by which popular culture is created.

 

Hence, a “fandom” that is created not through a single fan but when fans are connected to other fans is inevitable and the most important practice of popular culture.

 

According to “What Do Superfans Want?” (2016) written by Kang Jiwon, who used to be part of an idol fandom that is often belittled by words “superfan (crazed fan)” or “sasaeng fan (obsessive fan),” and her father, a fandom is a struggle for recognition among disadvantaged citizens who want to communicate with others and be part of something.

 

However, popular culture fandoms are slightly different from communities such as static or immobile regions and countries. This is because even though several individuals with the same enthusiasm for a specific artist, song, concert, movie, comic book, or novel share a sympathy without abandoning their personalities or characteristics and share excitement, social enhancement, camaraderie, and closeness that they didn’t experience before through this process, it’s not something that lasts from the far distant past into the unknown future like the country.

 

Anthropologist Victor Turner called a state of non-routine and strong empathy as “liminality” and called a situation of high-density sympathy that occurs shortly and temporarily between people who share liminality as “communitas.” The religious ceremonies where everybody’s social standing or status disappears and everybody becomes equal before god is a simple example of Turner’s “communitas.”

 

Turner pointed out that the experience of communitas in everyday life that is considered to be fixed and difficult to change creates a deviation and rift that enables individuals to endure society, and the flow of that deviation often fires up and even changes into a force that can change the entire community.

 

Where can we find the experience of communitas in our modern society where the influence of religion is not as strong as it was before? He cautiously predicted that sports or arts with a similar pull as theater or music may be able to take its place.

 

Anthropologist Edith Turner, Turner’s wife who continuously expanded on this topic, focused on the fact that popular culture has the power to make people feel like they’re “in the zone of a specific context or space,” and emphasized fandoms and the experience of fandoms in popular culture as communitas that have taken place deep in the daily lives of modern individuals. She particularly paid attention to concerts where people gather with other people that they don’t know to cheer and sing together.

 

The problem is that COVID-19 has taken away opportunities to experience fandoms in popular culture where you can share this type of public intimacy with unfamiliar people. Your attitude and how you appreciate a movie differ when you’re watching it online compared to when you’re watching it with others in theaters. Even if you go inside the theater without any expectations, as soon as you become aware of the person sitting to the front, side, and behind and the fact that you are “together,” you fall into a shallow, but a strong sense of communion with others via the screen and DOLBY speakers.

 

COVID-19 and social distancing have become huge obstacles for us in practicing popular culture based on chances to communicate and empathize with other people. This is why Netflix has seen subscriber numbers surge, and this is why online concerts are opening up.

 

Further, the government even argued for a need to actively plan concerts by using virtual reality (VR) (Yonhap News 6. 19. 2020). The goal is to make it possible for people to enjoy movies and performance with others just by wearing headgear and going online alone in the room. They seem to believe that popular culture is a personal and independent activity.

 

 

In September of last year, Billie Eilish held a VR concert and became a big issue. The VR concert came with social mode functions that allowed you to talk to the person next to you and make it feel like you were enjoying the concert together. It seems that Billie Eilish deemed communication with other people as the most significant factor of the concert. The problem is that there is a tremendous gap between artists and manufacturers who have the capital, technology, and ability to create the type of software that will provide a rich VR experience and those who do not.

 

Mainstream performances held at the main stadium of Jamsil Sports Complex and enjoyed by tens of thousands of people with a large sound system and non-mainstream music performances held in a small concert hall where performers directly communicate with an audience of less than a hundred have different characteristics and meanings. However, as soon as concerts are converted into a VR environment, the special charm, advantages, and disadvantages of each of these concerts will disappear and only the power of capital will remain.

 

However, the fact of being “physically” together in a concert hall or theater is not the most meaningful for the power of popular culture. However, being “physically” together in a concert hall or theater is not the most meaningful thing regarding the power of popular culture. It is significant to be there at the moment when popular culture is carried out, but it is much more critical to meet, communicate, and empathize with others via works, songs, and artists.

 

The significance of a piece of work differs depending on the level of sympathy, and communication becomes deeper through the process of finding similarities and differences. People can interact with each other through the stories that are expressed in the lyrics, the subtle changes in sound, and the facial expressions of the actor in a delicate manner.

 

After COVID-19, popular culture will take place in various structures where niche communitas will be connected by communication of affection in cyberspace that has been continuously enhanced in the 21st century. The fact that not all K-Pop fans are alike will become more apparent, the semiotic interaction between mainstream and non-mainstream cultures will become stronger, leading to an experience that is closely connected and disconnected.

 

English(中文·日本語) news is the result of applying Google Translate. <iN THE NEWS> is not responsible for the content of English(中文·日本語) news.

배너

유은실 기자 yes24@inthenews.co.kr


[C-레벨 터치]치킨 3위 교촌…허니시리즈 만든 송종화 ‘절박함’ 통할까

[C-레벨 터치]치킨 3위 교촌…허니시리즈 만든 송종화 ‘절박함’ 통할까

2024.04.25 07:00:00

인더뉴스 장승윤 기자ㅣ치킨업계 1위를 지켜온 교촌치킨의 성장세가 멈췄습니다. 적극적인 출점과 마케팅으로 점유율을 끌어올린 bhc, BBQ와 대비되는 흐름에 본업 경쟁력을 의심하는 목소리가 흘러나오는 상황입니다. 교촌은 '허니시리즈의 아버지' 송종화 대표 체제에서 올해 새판 짜기에 돌입합니다. 25일 업계에 따르면 지난해 치킨업계 매출 순위가 뒤바뀌었습니다. bhc 매출이 전년보다 5.5% 증가한 5356억원으로 교촌치킨을 제치고 1위에 올랐습니다. 치킨 3사 중 유일하게 매출 5000억원을 넘겼습니다. BBQ는 지난해 매출이 12.8% 증가한 4732억원을 기록한 가운데 2년 연속 500억원 넘게 올랐습니다. 교촌에프앤비만 역성장했습니다. 지난해 매출이 4450억원으로 1년 전보다 14% 줄었습니다. 2014년부터 8년간 이어온 국내 치킨프렌차이즈 업계 선두 자리를 bhc에 뺏겼고 BBQ에 2위 자리마저 내줬습니다. 3위로 내려앉았지만 이유는 있습니다. 교촌은 외연 확장보다 내실을 택했습니다. 실제로 지난해 수익성 개선에 성공한 교촌에프앤비입니다. 영업이익이 248억원으로 전년 대비 181% 늘었습니다. 1년 사이 3배 급증했습니다. 영업이익률도 1.7%에서 5.6%로 3.9%p 끌어올렸습니다. bhc와 BBQ의 영업이익은 각각 1203억원, 553억원으로 전년보다 15.2%, 13.7% 줄었습니다. 교촌에프앤비 측은 "당초 가맹점 확장 전략을 추구했다면 매출이 큰 폭으로 올라 업계 순위 회복이 어렵지 않았겠지만 권원강 교촌에프앤비 회장은 쉬운 길을 선택하지 않았다"며 "무엇보다 가맹점 수익이 우선이라는 권 회장 경영철학을 2023년 실적에서도 보여줬다"고 말했습니다. 교촌에프앤비는 가맹점 및 파트너사와 상생 협력 관계 구축을 강조하고 있습니다. 점포당 점주 매출은 업계 최고 수준입니다. 공정거래위원회 가맹사업거래에 따르면 2022년 교촌치킨 가맹점의 전국 평균매출액은 7억5000만원으로 bhc(6억원), BBQ(4억3000만원)보다 높습니다. 0%대 폐점률도 이를 입증합니다. 다만 가맹점주 수익성 보전에만 초점을 맞춘 결과 외형 성장이 더뎠고 매출이 크게 떨어졌습니다. 지난해 경쟁사들이 수십 개 이상 매장을 낼 때 교촌에프앤비의 신규 출점 매장은 10개에 불과했습니다. 전국 가맹점 수(2022년)에서도 교촌에프앤비(1365개)는 BBQ(2041개), bhc(1991개)와 차이가 큽니다. 특히 치킨 가격 인상을 주도한다는 점이 매출 하락의 결정적인 요인으로 작용했습니다. 교촌은 2018년 업계 최초로 배달비를 도입했고 이는 요식업계 전체 배달비 유료화에 영향을 미쳤습니다. 교촌은 지난해 4월에도 주요 메뉴 가격을 나홀로 최대 3000원 인상하며 소비자들의 눈총을 받았습니다. 경쟁사 대비 부족한 히트 상품도 보완 과제로 언급됩니다. 교촌의 인기 제품으로는 1991년 간장치킨(교촌시리즈)을 시작으로 2004년 레드시리즈, 2010년 허니시리즈 등이 손꼽힙니다. 허니시리즈 이후 15년 가까이 꾸준히 신제품을 내고 있으나 히트작으로 불릴 만한 상품을 내놓지 못하고 있다는 분석입니다. 지난 2020년 24가지 재료로 완성한 불맛을 강조하며 선보인 '교촌신화'는 반짝 인기를 끌었으나 오래가지 못하고 2년 뒤인 2022년 7월 단종됐습니다. 교촌에프앤비는 같은달 블랙시크릿을 출시하며 5가지 향신료로 만든 이국적인 치킨 콘셉트를 앞세웠고 콤보 출시, 시식단 모집 등 마케팅을 강화했습니다. 블랙시크릿은 지난해 1월 출시 약 6개월 만에 누적 판매량이 100만마리를 돌파하며 가능성을 보였으나 시장에 반향을 일으킬 정도로 보기는 어렵다는 평이 지배적입니다. 교촌에프앤비 입장에서는 허니시리즈를 이어 매출 증대와 신규 고객 창출을 견인할 인기 제품이 필요한 실정입니다. 이는 송종화 부회장을 교촌의 새 사령탑으로 임명한 배경이기도 합니다. 교촌은 지난달 정기주주총회를 열고 송 부회장을 신임 대표로 선임했습니다. 송 대표는 2003년부터 2012년까지 교촌에프앤비 총괄상무 및 사장으로 재직한 전문경영인입니다. 지난해 9월 부회장으로 11년 만에 경영에 복귀했습니다. 송 대표는 2000년대 초반 조류 인플루엔자(AI) 파동으로 가라앉은 치킨 프렌차이즈 시장 위기를 극복하고 교촌치킨을 치킨 선두 브랜드로 올리는 데 기여한 프렌차이즈 전문가로 평가받습니다. 임원 재직 당시 미국과 중국 시장 진출을 주도했습니다. 2010년에는 교촌의 효자 상품인 '허니시리즈'를 출시했습니다. 허니시리즈는 후라이드와 양념으로 대표되던 치킨 시장에 꿀을 활용해 상품화에 성공했습니다. 치킨 고객층을 아이와 여성들까지 넓히는 첨병 역할을 했습니다. 2014년에는 허니시리즈 판매량이 전년 대비 2배가량 신장하며 그해 매출과 영업이익이 전년 대비 각각 30%, 63% 증가하는 데 큰 역할을 했습니다. 최근 교촌은 신사업 확장에 주력하는 모앙새입니다. 이마트와 협력해 자사 소스를 상품화한 K1 핫소스를 출시하며 소스 시장에 진출했고 지난해 6월에는 이태원에 '치킨 오마카세' 닭요리 전문점 교촌필방을 열었습니다. 올초에도 여의도에 메밀 한식주점 '메밀단편'을 론칭하고 소비자 반응을 살피고 있습니다. 이러한 교촌의 신사업 시도는 매출 부진과 맞물리며 본업 경쟁력 저하에 대한 비판으로 연결되고 있습니다. 교촌에프앤비는 그룹 성장의 전기를 마련한 송 대표 체제에서 재도약을 도모한다는 계획입니다. 송 대표는 국내가맹사업과 신성장사업, 해외사업, 각 계열사 등을 총괄하는 역할을 맡습니다. 송 대표는 취임사를 통해 "경기위축과 소비침체 등 회사 안팎의 여러 위기를 극복하기 위해 ‘절박함’을 갖고 업무에 임할 것"이라며 "지속적 경영혁신을 통해 체질 개선을 가속화하고, 브랜드 경쟁력 강화와 미래 성장동력 확보에 주력해 교촌을 100년 기업으로 성장시키는 일에 열정을 바치겠다"고 말했습니다.


배너


배너